Start with one workflow. Get it working in 4–6 weeks.
Most AI platform projects stall at the demo. We pick one high-value workflow — deal briefs, proposals, renewal risk, support triage — and get it shipped end-to-end. Then we expand from what worked, not what was planned.
Discovery call → workflow pick → shipped system in 4–6 weeks → expand systematically.
Built for B2B ops, sales, and support leaders whose AI efforts have stalled at the demo or pilot stage.
20+ years engineering leadership · 100+ products shipped · production AI systems across Sales, Ops, Support
Why most AI workflow projects stall.
The same failure modes recur across every industry. Here's what we see.
Demo-ware, not production
Your AI POC dazzled in the demo. Three months in, no one uses it. Accuracy drifted, outputs stopped at drafts, no one wired it into the CRM.
Platform-first projects stall
"Build the AI platform first" becomes a 12-month roadmap. Business outcomes are 18 months away. You need a win in six weeks.
No production path
Scripts live in notebooks. Outputs stop at email drafts. Nothing is integrated with Salesforce, Zendesk, Google Workspace — where the work actually happens.
No feedback loop
AI output quality decays. No one is measuring it, let alone improving it. The model gets dumber while everyone assumes it is getting smarter.
What a single-workflow build delivers
One workflow shipped end-to-end. Real data in, real outputs out, wired into your tools.
- Working AI system producing the output daily (or on-demand)
- Integrated with your source-of-truth systems (CRM, docs, ticketing)
- Feedback loop and evaluation pipeline built in
- Monitoring, alerts, and accuracy dashboards
- Runbooks for the team that owns the workflow
- A foundation that the next 2–3 workflows snap into
Scope before we sell you anything.
Free first steps before you commit.
Discovery call
30 minutes to walk through where AI is stuck, which workflows the business actually values, and which one we would bet on.
A shortlist of workflows ranked by ROI and complexity.
Opportunity map
One-week turnaround: 3–5 workflows prioritized by value, feasibility, and the path to production. Fixed scope for the first build.
A plan you can get leadership behind.
First working system
Senior engineers build and ship the chosen workflow in 4–6 weeks. Production deploy, feedback loop, and handover.
A production AI system delivering measurable outcomes.
What a shipped workflow looks like.
FounderBrand AI — content-automation platform
The problem
Marketing team was manually turning 1-hour founder interviews into 15+ pieces of SEO-optimized content per guest. The process consumed 20+ hours per week and editing fatigue was capping throughput.
The outcome
Shipped an AI pipeline that converts raw video interviews into structured content assets — long-form blog, short-form social, SEO briefs, email drafts. Human editor stays in the loop for voice and quality.
Have one workflow you wish was AI-powered? Let's scope it.
Get a workflow reviewCommon questions
Is this an AI platform project?
No — and that's deliberate. We build one workflow end-to-end first. The infrastructure emerges from what the workflow actually needs. Most 'platform-first' projects stall before they ship anything usable.
What does it cost?
First workflow runs $100–250k depending on integration complexity and quality thresholds. Discovery call and opportunity map are free.
What workflows do you build?
Deal briefs, proposal drafts, renewal risk scoring, support triage, meeting summaries, report generation, lead enrichment. Anything repetitive, high-volume, and LLM-suited.
Which LLMs and vendors?
We're model-agnostic. Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama — whatever fits the workflow, your data constraints, and your cost envelope. We evaluate; you own the decision.
What about data security?
Production workflows run on your cloud (AWS/GCP/Azure) via private endpoints. No training on your data. Logs stay in your infra. SOC 2 / HIPAA stacks on request.
How is this different from Zapier or n8n?
Those are great for simple integrations. We build when the logic needs real LLM reasoning, quality thresholds, feedback loops, or handoff to humans — things an automation platform can't maintain alone.
Is this the right fit?
Good fit
- Specific high-value workflow candidate in mind
- One or more AI POCs have stalled at demo or pilot
- Budget for a $100–250k fixed-scope first build
- Leadership alignment on shipping one thing well before scaling
Not a fit
- "We need to build an AI strategy first" — start with AEMI instead
- Looking for a subscription-priced automation platform
- No workflow owner accountable for the outcome
- Budget below ~$80k
Have one workflow you wish was AI-powered?
30 minutes with a CTO. Bring the workflow, the tools involved, and what good looks like.